Return to site

What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?

 If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile. The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause problems for people. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health. The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue. Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could result in a wide range of possible harms, like the development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer. Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away the tower is. Although this may sound like something that's good but the truth is that those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas. However, this study also showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues). safe distance to live from cell phone tower ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines. In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In what is a safe distance from a cell tower is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.

safe distance to live from cell phone tower|safe distance to live from cell phone tower|what is a safe distance from a cell tower